Tag Archive for: inside bar

Understanding Price Action Context

Want to Increase Your Profitability? Try this powerful approach

If you want to find high probability trades, and skip those with a low probability of working out, you’ll need to develop a core skill. Does this sound interesting? Then keep on reading. What is this skill you ask?

I am talking about trading with price action context.

Good Trading Decisions Are Based Upon Context

First, let’s define the word ‘context’. Context = understanding and approaching a situation based upon the ‘context’ (or environmental variables) around it.

In price action, the ‘context’ is a way of describing the overall environment, and using that to help you trade with the underlying order flow. We have 3 filters to understand the price action context in our Trading Masterclass Course. For the purposes of this article, we’ll talk about impulsive and corrective moves.

Impulsive and Corrective Moves

Now I’ve already done many videos and articles on impulsive and corrective moves. For a more in-depth study, you can watch this video on impulsive and corrective price action, or this article on impulsive and corrective moves. But to sum them up briefly:

Impulsive moves = large bars + majority of bars 1 color + closes towards the highs/lows

Corrective moves = smaller bars + mix of colors + closes towards the middle

An example of an impulsive move is below:

Impulsive move 2ndskiesforex

And an example of a corrective move is below:

Corrective move 2ndskiesforex

As a whole, impulsive and corrective moves communicate a lot about the price action context, such as the underlying order flow behind it.

During impulsive moves, the order flow is relatively ‘imbalanced’, meaning it’s dominant towards one side (buying/selling) which causes strong directional moves.

During corrective moves, the order flow is relatively ‘balanced’, meaning there is no strong winner between the buyers/sellers, hence the market goes mostly sideways.

Using Impulsive and Corrective Moves to Discover the Price Action Context

Now that we understand the basics of impulsive and corrective moves, we can use them to discover the price action context of the market.

As a general rule, an impulsive move (the majority of the time) is followed by a corrective move. If the impulsive move is with trend, then the next move after the corrective move will more often be an impulsive move in the same direction.

Two good examples of this are below:

Example 1: Impulsive and Corrective Moves

Impulsive & Corrective moves 2ndskiesforex

Example 2: Impulsive and Corrective Moves

Impulsive & Corrective moves 2ndskiesforex

Now what do impulsive and corrective moves teach us about price action context?

They give us an underlying sense of what the dominant order flow is. If you see a potential trend in place, along with a good series of impulsive and corrective moves, then you can feel confident the overall price action context is bullish, and thus you should be looking to buy more often than sell.

Now instead of waiting for a pin bar, fakey or some other 1-2 bar confirmation price action signal, look at the impulsive and corrective moves for trade opportunities as they will often offer you many.

You don’t need a 1-2 bar candlestick pattern to know if the market is bullish – just determine the overall ‘context’, and trade with the impulsive and corrective structure as much as possible.

NOTE: If you want to learn how to find high probability trade setups using impulsive and corrective moves, check out our Trading Masterclass course.

The bottom line is – many of those 1-2 bar candlestick patterns (pin bars, fakey’s, inside bars, etc) don’t form that often. Yet if there is a strong trend in place, why are you waiting for a pattern that may never materialize, when the overall order flow is already bullish?

Get into that trend and make some money. Just make sure the price action context is in your favor. A great way to determine this is to make sure you can read the impulsive and corrective moves.

The most favorable situation is when you are trading in the direction of the impulsive moves (not against them) because you’re trading with the dominant order flow in the market. It also means you can make money faster because impulsive moves travel farther and faster than corrective moves.

Hopefully you can now see how price action context, particularly spotting the impulsive and corrective moves, can give help you find better trade setups.

Want To Learn More About Price Action Context?

While impulsive and corrective moves are a crucial part to determining price action context, they are not the whole. We have two other key factors to determining price action context and what the dominant order flow is in the market.

To learn more about these two, check out our Trading Masterclass Course where we teach you higher, lower and multiple time frame context with clear rules to understanding them. In fact, our entire 1st section of lessons is dedicated specifically towards understanding price action context.

To get access to these lessons within minutes, click here. Inside the course, you’ll also learn how to read other critical (or more advanced) price action structures and find more trade setups.

Keep in mind, trading with price action context is a skill that works on any instrument, time frame or environment. If you’re learning a price action strategy or approach that only works on specific time frames, then it’s a limited strategy that doesn’t really understand price action or PA context.

Until then – I look forward to your comments and feedback.

5 Reasons Why Hedge Funds Aren’t Trading Confirmation Price Action Signals

albert einstein not following the crowd
This article is going to be a tad ‘controversial‘ to many developing traders out there. It is not meant to be negative in tone or start arguments.
It is to get you to question what you’ve been told about price action. It is to open up a dialogue, about another way of approaching PA beyond the typical narrative.
The general price action story spun out there goes something like this;
To make any buying/selling decisions and pulling the trigger, it ultimately comes down to one final piece of the puzzle.
This final piece comes in the form of a ‘confirmation price action signal‘. And said ‘signals’ only arise in the form of a 1 or 2 bar combination.
They come in many names, such as pin bars, inside bars, fakey/false break setups, or engulfing bars.
pin bar fakey price action signal failed
And the follow up to this magical fakey pin bar signal…
pin bar fakey price action signal failed 2ndskiesforex
Regardless of the name, the idea is the same. You should not enter the market till you see one of these famed 1-2 bar price action patterns.
Thus far, everyone spinning this narrative are derivatives. What do I mean by this?
Those who preach confirmation price action signals, copied all they knew (with minor adjustments) from someone else.
Many of them were students of one individual (Nial Fuller). A little investigation will reveal Nial Fuller’s price action strategies are also derivatives.
He was a member of J16 and copied all he knew from there, again with only minor adjustments.
If you look at most of the price action mentors, you’ll see the overwhelming similarity & repetition. Now you know why the narrative around PA sounds the same.
Essentially, they are either a derivative (copy) or a derivative of a derivative (copy of a copy). What you’ll also notice is none (or almost none) of them have institutional experience.
What’s really being sold here is a ‘green light buy/red light sell‘ methodology. It’s targeting easy prey who don’t want to do the work, who want understanding price action to be easy, who want to be lazy traders (in their own words).
Yes, with just three simple setups that are easy to find, you too can make profitable buying and selling decisions! Or so you are told…
The reality is far different from this (especially in institutions and hedge funds). By the end of this article, I’m guessing you’ll start to see why.
Below are my 5 reasons why hedge funds don’t trade confirmation price action signals.
 

Reason #1: Paying 5-6 figures To Train Their Traders?

smb training
photo: smbtraining.com (does it look like he’s sitting there just waiting for daily pin bars to form???)
The skill and time required to identify pin bars, inside bars, fakey’s and engulfing bars is minimal (a few months max). Shoot, you can even build an algo to do this for a few hundred dollars.
Bank traders on average will make 2000-4000 trades before they can trade the bank’s money. Hedge funds will also spend large amounts of money and time either training or finding talented traders.
If trading is as simple as finding these three patterns to enter the market, why spend so much to find/train traders what a $300 algo could do?
There is a reason for this.
Because reading and trading PA goes beyond confirmation price action signals. Because buying and selling decisions aren’t as simple as these 1 and 2 bar patterns.
If they were, there would never be the need for such expensive and exhaustive training programs. Would you ever spend that much training someone to trade daily pin bars?
My guess is no.
 

Reason #2 Macro + Technical

prop tradinng firms
 
If a fund is not trading algorithmically, most likely they are incorporating a combo of macro (read fundamental) + technical analysis.
I talked about this in my article Book Review: Cultures of Expertise in the Forex Trading Markets. The author (Leon Wansleben) is a sociologist who followed forex traders at a top-10 German bank desk for over a year.
Never once are the words ‘pin bar’, ‘engulfing bar’, ‘inside bar’ or ‘fakey’ mentioned in the book.
What you do find is traders working a combination of macro/fundamentals + technical analysis into how they trade.
They also discount the ‘lower time frames are noise‘ meme pretty quickly. Why?
Because most bank traders have to be reading the intra-day price action (due to flow trades, which accounts for about 70% of their trades).
By the end of the book, you realize entering the market goes way beyond pin bars, engulfing bars and inside bars. You realize they aren’t even trading those to make their buying and selling decisions.
 

Reason #3 Confirmation Decreases Accuracy and Profitability

 
“I was in (insert derivative name here) price action course and quickly realized how weak it is compared to yours. 
I’ve made over 20% in the last few months using your methods. I’m glad you poked giant holes in his price action strategies. 
Otherwise I’d still be waiting for pin bars and inside bars, missing hundreds of pips.“
After posting my video How A Typical Pin Bar Entry Is A Retail One, many struggling traders started to see price action differently.
They realized how many times they were sitting on the sidelines doing nothing when others were making money. They also realized how waiting for ‘confirmation signals’ decreased their accuracy and profitability.
To learn why this is the case, watch my video below.
pin bar entry is a retail entry
 
 

Reason #4 Waiting for Confirmation Price Action Signals is Passive Trading

 
Hedge funds and bank traders are (if anything) passive when it comes to entering the markets.
Institutional traders would not (and could not) be making trading decisions once a daily pin bar has formed.
If they were doing this so consistently, they’d be picked off by HFT’s or predatorial funds who could see their entries a mile away.
This is on top of the fact they’d all be competing for the same liquidity and relative price, which would only mean a worse entry and lesser profits on the same trading idea.
A little investigation into how predictable these entries are will change your perspective on trading.
 

#5 The Pepsi Challenge

pepsi challenge
Ok, let’s say you are a devout believer the real way to trade price action is via confirmation price action signals.
Let’s say the above 4 reasons didn’t convince you. We can simplify this through a pretty simple test – The Pepsi Challenge.
Your challenge, should you choose to accept:
Walk into a dozen or two hedge fund offices, bank trading desks and prop trading firms. Then ask them these two simple questions:
 
1) If you don’t see a daily pin bar, engulfing bar, or inside bar, are you staying out of the market?
2) If you do see a daily pin bar, engulfing bar, or inside bar, are you loading up on your position even more than usual?
 
I’m willing to bet the answers to the above questions will be a resounding NO.
More likely, you’ll get several laughs, along with someone perhaps escorting you out of the office.
 

To Date

waiting 2ndskiesforex
As it stands right now, nobody has taken me up on this litmus test (let alone proven otherwise). I’m still waiting as I posted this challenge many months ago.
I am confident(while open to being wrong) that after you take this test, you’ll look at price action differently.
Once you let go of the current narrative, you’ll be forced to examine how order flow and the balance/imbalance between buyers and sellers is reflected in the price action. You’ll begin to see how liquidity impacts the PA and volatility.
And you’ll start to trade contextually, meaning through the price action context.
That is when your real training in PA begins, when you let go of the freshman narrative. You’ll also realize trading those 1-2 bar patterns does not build your trading skills.
If trading pin bars really built PA trading skills, then bank traders would be going through thousands of reps on those alone.
It takes no skill to find those signals and spend your time looking for them. And doing so discounts all the other candles in the process.
 

About All Those Other Candles…

 
All those other candles is what forms a structure. This ‘structure’ is (by and large) a representation of the order flow.
The order flow gets reflected in the PA, and this PA forms the price action context.
This is where your study should be.
 

In Conclusion

 
Looking for 1-2 bar patterns doesn’t make you a price action trader. It makes you candlestick trader, and that is a different approach to the markets.
When you investigate it, hedge funds aren’t trading via confirmation price action signals. And when you stop waiting for confirmation, you’ll find yourself getting better trade locations and higher + R per trade.
Looking at the market contextually will change your mindset. You’ll start trading and thinking in probabilities.
You’ll also discover how waiting for confirmation is a retail traders mindset.
With all that being said, do you agree or disagree with these forex confirmation price action trading misconceptions? Can you see how hedge funds aren’t trading price action signals this way?
Even if you don’t agree, please do comment and share below (in a non-negative tone por favor).
Regardless, I’m hoping you’ll really open up to other ways at trading price action.
Until then – may good health, trading profits and success be with you.

,

Quality vs Quantity – Which is Better for Trading?

There seems to be a ton of confusion on both sides regarding the Quality vs Quantity Argument when it comes to trading.  Being such an important subject for a trader, I have been wanting to write about this for some time so it’s time to put some of the myths, mis-information and confusion to bed here.

quality vs quantity in trading 2ndskiestrading.com

One of the big forex trading arguments going around has to do with ‘Quality vs Quantity‘, and it is often masked in the typical;

-Trading Higher Time Frames = More Accuracy

-Trading Smaller Time Frames Carry More Risk

-Anything Below The 1HR Charts is Just Noise

-Quality Trades Make More Money Than Quantity

In regards to the above statements, only one of them is true, but it is incomplete by itself and does not paint the whole picture.

Today’s article is here to dive into this subject, explore both sides of it, and talk about which of the two competing theories is correct.

Quality Is Better Than Quantity When It Comes To Trading
I know two groups of billion dollar business entities that would completely disagree with this argument. They would be Casino’s and HFT shops (High Frequency Trading).

Casinos often times (in the various games you can play there), only have a slight edge, often times 1-4%, meaning they are 51-56% likely to win at every play, with a 49-44% chance to lose.  This small edge might not seem like a lot, but played out over 1000’s of times a day, and it all adds up.

high frequency trading algos quantity vs quality 2ndskiestrading.com
HFT algos also take a similar approach.  They are not trying to make huge winners and let trades run for days. They are in anywhere from hours to minutes, perhaps seconds, or even nan0-seconds.  They make small trades for ultra small profit, but they do this hundreds of times a day, and make money year in year out.

These two things alone debunk the whole quality is better than quantity argument, as they are highly successful at what they do.  In 2011 alone, HFT firms made over $1.2B (yes, billion) in profits.  Not bad for having such an inferior trading style!

HFT methods simply use the mathematics and repetition of the edge to make profit.  It’s an edge – maybe not the easiest for a human trader, but an edge nonetheless, and it makes money.

The bottom line is, if you have an edge, the more times you can apply it with the same level of accuracy, the more the edge will play out in your favor.  And that leads to more profits.

quality vs quantity a comparison approach 2ndskiestrading.com

A Comparison Approach
To really see the numbers and a comparison approach, let’s take System A with 60% accuracy, trading 5x a month, risking 100 pips and targeting 200 pips.  Below is how the math works out;

5 trades over 12 months = 60 trades per year
60 trades x 60% accuracy = 36 winners and 24 losers
36 winners at 200 pips gained =  7200 pips gained
24 losers at 100 pips lost = 2400 pips lost
Total Profit =  +4800 pips

Now, lets take System B, which is the same as System A, but bring down the accuracy just 5%, assuming you will be less accurate trading the same system on a lower time frame.  Let’s have you trading 20x a month (~5x per week), risking 50 pips and targeting 100 pips (same ratio of risk to reward).  Here is how the math plays out below;

20 trades a month = 240 trades per year
240 trades at 55% accuracy =  132 winners and 108 losers
132 winners at 100 pips gained per trade =  13200 pips gained
108 losers at 50 pips lost per trade = 5400 pips lost
Total Profit = +7800 pips

Assuming you risked the same equity % per trade using System B – trading quantity over quality made more pips and profit.  Even if I make System A 15 % more accurate than System B, here is how the math plays out;

60 trades at 70% accuracy = 42 winners and 18 losers
42 winners at 200 pips gained per trade = 8400 pips gained
18 losers at 100 pips lost per trade = 1800 pips lost
Total Profit = +6600 pips

As you can see, even being 15% more accurate, System A still under-performs System B.  Only until you get to 77% accuracy will System A outperform System B.

So this whole argument that Quality over Quantity is mathematically false.

One of the key questions you should be asking yourself then is;

Can I be 77% accurate trading my system on the higher time frames?

If not, you may want to reconsider how to maximize your edge, which is all you are really doing in trading. But the fact is that trading on higher time frames will take longer to make money as you will have less signals in the market.

quality vs quantity key points 2ndskiestrading.com
Key Points
A few of the typical or vanilla counter-arguments to the quantity makes more than quality statements are;

1) Trading higher time frames is less stressful and is More Accurate

2) Anything below 1hr charts is just noise

3) Trading lower time frames causes you to over-trade and over-analyze

Of the above statements, only one is true to some degree (#1) , but again it is incomplete by itself and needs to be fully understood.  Let me break down each one so you can fully understand the differences.

Trading Higher Time Frames is Less Stressful and More Accurate:
Of all the statements, this is really the only one with some truth, and it has to do with the second part (being more accurate).

I have quantitatively tested various 1, 2 and 3 bar price action signals (over 24 in total), such as pin bars, inside bars, engulfing bars, 2-bar reversals, outside bars, and more across every time frame from the 1m to weekly.  Statistically, if you are just trading these patterns by themselves, they tend to be more accurate on time frames such as daily and 4hr strategies (along with the 1hr), then they do on say the 5m.

The reason for this is, a daily candle includes 24hrs of price action, therefore 24hrs of market sentiment and order flow, which is three sessions total.  This can have a lot of info as to how players are positioning themselves both intraday and daily.

Thus, with a greater amount of market sentiment over a longer period of time, you can trade some of these patterns with greater accuracy.

However, as we have seen above, greater accuracy does not always = more profits.  One thing should be noted though accuracy is not the same trading the often promoted NY Daily Close.

I have one system that on the NY Daily Close, on one pair, trades highly accurate, but another pair quite poorly.  If you have an idea as to why, write in a comment below, but the statistics and profitability are night and day, so NY Daily Close is not ideal for all systems, pairs and time frames, and in many cases, under-performs massively.

Thus to sum it up, trading the higher time frame ‘can’ lead to more accuracy.

However, the notion of trading the higher time frame is less stressful is not true, and really a matter of having a successful trading mindset.  Some people are more naturally wired to have a set and forget style of trading.  Others are better at managing small details, so trading a higher time frame would actually work against their natural mindset.

lower time frames is more stressful 2ndskiestrading.com

There is no one-size fits all, thus the key is to find what is most natural to you.

I would like to state generally, if I was starting with a new student, I would start them on a higher time frame as accuracy in the beginning is critical to the learning process.  This is exactly how it is in my archery training – in the beginning you start with a target close by, say 3-6 meters, and only after time do you move to targets farther away.

But the idea of lower time frames being more stressful is a matter of mindset, training and practice. Stress is based on how one perceives information and reacts to stimuli.  To some people, being bored is more stressful, and there are tons of studies that boredom can hugely interfere with the trading and learning process.  For an F1 driver, being stuck in traffic may feel like torture, but doing 150MPH may be joyful. Food for thought.

Anything below 1hr charts is just noise:

First off, this argument often comes from daily chart traders saying price action below the 1hr is just noise. Ironically, this same argument comes from 1hr chart traders who say the 1m time frame is just noise. Who is right, and is it just a matter of perspective?

The truth of the matter is, although there is a greater possibility to witness ‘noise‘ (price action that is the result of non-directional interest and order flow), on lower time frames, support and resistance levels work just the same.  They simply require a little tweaking.  But the bottom line is, order flow creates price action, and price action is simply information.

Using a recent example of a live intraday price action trade I did on Gold, take a look at the two charts below;

Exhibit A (4hr Time Frame Gold/USD)
price action quality vs quantity 2ndskiestrading.com exhibit a gold 4hr chart

Looking at the chart above, we can see three strong reactions to the $1685 level on Gold, all communicating strong buying interest at this level.

Now look at the chart below which is the third rejection on the 5m time frame.

Exhibit B (5m Time Frame Gold/USD)
price action pin bar + inside bar combo quality vs quantity 2ndskiestrading.com exhibit b gold 5m chart

Looking at the chart above, we can see the same strong reaction and buying interest off this level in the first wick.  But we can also see there are two high quality price action signals off this level, with a pin bar false break, along with an inside bar + pin bar combo.

I actually got long on this trade, and made over +1415 pips of profit just using pure price action on the 5m chart.

Does the price action at the bottom of this chart look like ‘noise‘ to you?

I don’t think so, and it shouldn’t.

Learning to filter out useful information and helpful information is just a matter of training and time.  But the idea anything below the 1hr chart is just ‘noise‘ is ridiculous and really a freshman understanding of price action.

Trading Lower Time Frames Causes You To Over-Trade and is Greater Risk:

Although there is some truth to this, it really is misleading.  If you analyze each bar, sure, you will be over-analyzing the charts, but this applies to any time frame.  In a choppy range, you are not watching every bar for clues, especially the bars in the middle of the range.

However, if you are marking your key levels on a higher time frame, and simply looking for signals at those levels, then the chances of you over-analyzing are slim.  It is really a question of trading and preparation- not a fact that you will over-analyze.

mind has neuro-plasticity 2ndskiestrading.com

The mind has neuro-plasticity to it and can learn almost any skill.  You can learn to filter out unimportant bars and price action on the chart – all it takes is a little practice.  Once you do, you wait for your key levels and signals, and get in without any extra analysis or stress.

The whole idea of doing less is better for you (or being lazy), I have already demonstrated, doesn’t make you more profitable.  Try this same logic to exercising, playing piano or hitting a golf ball, and tell me how that works out!

As to trading the lower time frames or intraday trading equaling greater risk, is a confusion.  Risk has nothing to do with the time frame.  Risk has to do with three things;

1) Position Sizing
2) Size of Stop Loss in Relation to Target
3) Accuracy

I can have a 3 pip stop (via position sizing) = more risk than a 500 pip stop.  I can also make more money with a 50 pip target and 20 pip stop (2.5:1 reward-risk ratio) than a 500 pip target and 250 pip stop (2:1 reward to risk ratio), with the same equity % at risk per trade.  So this notion that risk is > on lower time frames is mis-informed.

Does This Mean Quantity Is Better Than Quality?
This is the real question, and it comes down to edge, personality and availability.  If you are not available to trade more throughout the day, and have a full time job with only a few hours to view the charts, then I’d suggest trading the higher time frames.  However, if your personality is more suited to being more active, then trading 4-5x a month could be harmful to your learning process.   So remember trading rule # 1 – know thyself when it comes to trading, and find a system, time frame and style that best suits you.

trading rule #1 know thyself 2ndskiestrading.com

And we always have to consider our edge.  If we trade the daily time frame at 60% accuracy, and the 4hr or 1hr time frames more often with slightly less accurately, do the math and see how it works out.  If it’s more profitable trading more often with slightly less accuracy, then do it, as long as it doesn’t throw off your life or health.

But the bottom line is, the whole argument quality is better than quantity doesn’t always hold up, and you need to do the research and the numbers to determine which has a greater edge.  And without a doubt, it is a fact if you can take your same edge, and apply it more often than you are now, you will make more money and be more profitable.

Thus, in regards to the question as to which is forex trading method is better, the answer is neither one is better, but both!

Quality matters, but can under-perform.  Quantity repeats the process faster of making profit, but has to be considered in the larger scheme and what is most natural for you.  However neither forex trading method is better, and the best edge lies somewhere in between the two.

So don’t be fooled by any freshman arguments stating one is better than the other – because they are simply not true, highly inaccurate and misleading.

Hopefully this quality vs quantity forex trading article will put a lot of the mis-information to rest, and give you a new perspective on this critical subject. In a follow up article, I will talk about how I approach this subject in my personal trading, and what I think is the ‘Ideal Trader‘ in relationship to these two.

Kind Regards,
Chris Capre

,

Why You Cannot Trade Every Inside Bar

In one of our previous forex tip articles, we wrote about the inside bar and how it is an important price action formation that can offer great trading opportunities.  However it is important to note not all inside bars are created equal. To Review: An inside bar is a bar where the entire price action (including the wicks) are totally inside the previous bar.  Now on lower time frames these are more common and not too important (say on anything less than 1hr chart) but on the 1hr time compressions and above, they have a lot more significance.  In total, Inside bars form approximately 10% of the time (or are approximately 10% of all candles) and are a unique price action formation. When they occur at critical support / resistance levels (prior highs/lows, Fibonacci retracement levels, outer pivots, larger Kumo formations, etc) they have more impact and can often lead to strong price moves. There are several key reasons why an inside bar would form which a few are listed below:

  • Price is consolidating after a large up/down move in price and is about to start another leg in the same direction
  • Price is coming up against a critical support/resistance level which shows some hesitation in the market as to whether it will continue or not
  • Price Action and liquidity is dropping before a critical news announcement so with nobody taking new positions, price will not have enough order flow to move consistently in one direction
  • Profits are being taken

Since news events naturally drain liquidity before the event, they become less important in forming inside bars.  The key things to note is that an inside bar generally forms from a) the consolidation of a large move before starting another leg or b) price is coming up against a critical support/resistance level which shows hesitation in the market. This pause in the price action gives us a great chance to get into trending moves as we can use the inside bar to get into the trend before the next leg starts. However,  you still cannot treat them as equal.  As traders we have to note whether the inside bars are occurring with trend or counter-trend?  If they are occurring counter-trend, then they become much more difficult to trade. Case in point, take a look at the chart below on the GBPUSD 4hr chart.  The trend is clearly to the upside with virtually no red bars and a 300pip climb.  Then we have a red bar in the middle of the chart followed by a blue

inside bar.  This inside blue bar was followed by another 250pip leg up. inside bar chart 1 Even though the pause happened at the 1.5100 barrier and after a decent wick rejection to the upside, the bottom line is the inside bar formed after a down candle.  The translation of this is price hit a resistance, traders took some profits, started to evaluate the move and while doing so, price sold off a little.  An inside bar formed after price sold off a little so this inside bar does not tell us much other than price volatility is contracting.  These are the least informative of the inside bar setups. Thus, you cannot trade every inside bar the same as they signify many different price action situations. With that being said, there are ways to trade them efficiently.  We have actually analyzed inside bars on every pair from the 1hr to weekly time frames.  From this data, we were able to extract the % chance it would; -break with trend -break counter-trend -what the average pip break with trend was -what the average pip break counter-trend was -and several other metrics If you want to get access to this and other proprietary quantitative data on the inside bar strategy or several other price action setups we have tested, then check out our Price Action and Pivot Point course where you get access to this data along with permanent access to our live forum and a follow up private one-on-one session. To learn more about this course, click on the link Price Action and Pivot Point Course or email us directly via the Contact Page